Low-Latency Low-Complexity Heap-Based Extended Min-Sum Algorithms for Non-Binary Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

IET communications(2015)

引用 3|浏览7
摘要
The extended min-sum (EMS) and improved EMS (I-EMS) algorithms for non-binary low-density parity-check codes over GF(q) significantly reduce the decoding complexity with an acceptable performance degradation, but they suffer from high latency because of many serial computations, including a sorting process. On the other hand, the trellis-based EMS algorithm can greatly reduce the latency, but it does not solve the complexity problem in high-order fields (q >= 64). To improve the latency problem with low-complexity advantages, the authors propose heap-based EMS (H-EMS) and heap-based I-EMS (HI-EMS) algorithms that are modifications of the EMS and I-EMS algorithms, respectively. The authors also propose double H-EMS and double HI-EMS algorithms trading off the latency against the performance by heaping messages twice. Numerical results show that the H-EMS algorithm has 2.74-9.52 times lower latency than the EMS algorithm with a negligible performance degradation over a wide range of code rates, whereas the HI-EMS algorithm has 1.20-1.62 times lower latency than the I-EMS algorithm. Furthermore, the proposed algorithms may be employed regardless of the decoding schedules.
更多
查看译文
关键词
decoding,parity check codes,Galois fields,low‐latency low‐complexity heap‐based extended min‐sum algorithms,nonbinary low‐density parity‐check codes,improved EMS algorithms,I‐EMS algorithms,GF(q),decoding complexity reduction,performance degradation,sorting process,trellis‐based EMS algorithm,heap‐based EMS algorithm,H‐EMS algorithm,heap‐based I‐EMS algorithm,HI‐EMS algorithms
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
0
您的评分 :

暂无评分

数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn