Midterm Cerebral Outcomes of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients Who Underwent Novel Triple‐branched Stent Graft Implantation Combined with Intraoperative Monitoring of Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation
Journal of Cardiac Surgery(2019)
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the cerebral outcomes of patients underwent novel triple-branched stent graft implantation combined with the intraoperative monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation. Methods One hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent the surgery of triple-branched stent graft implantation in our department were enrolled in this retrospective case-control study. The patients in group A received brain protection based on the intraoperative monitoring of regional cerebral oxygen saturation and the patients in group B received conventional brain protection. The general clinical data, the types of corrective surgeries, the intraoperative situations, the postoperative complications, and the midterm outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Results The incidence of postoperative cerebral dysfunction in the patients of group A was significantly lower than that in the patients in group B (3.2% vs 14.9%, P = .020). We found significant differences in the incubation times (30.3 +/- 22.1 vs 42.3 +/- 27.9 hours, P = .014), the lengths of intensive care unit stay (58.0 +/- 54.3 vs 79.7 +/- 55.5 hours, P = .004), and the hospital stays (19.3 +/- 6.7 vs 24.9 +/- 17.3 days, P = .045). A descending trend in the mortality rates was observed between the patients in the two groups based on the 20 months of observation; however, this trend was not statistically significant (1.6% vs 6.8%, P = .218). Conclusions The novel triple-branched stent graft implantation procedure combined with intraoperative monitoring of the regional cerebral oxygen saturation was an effective treatment for Stanford type A aortic dissection, with a relatively low incidence of postoperative cerebral dysfunction.
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn