Interstitial Lung Disease Progression after Genomic Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Testing.
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL(2023)
摘要
BackgroundA genomic classifier for usual interstitial pneumonia (gUIP) has been shown to predict histological UIP with high specificity, increasing diagnostic confidence for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Whether those with positive gUIP classification exhibit a progressive, IPF-like phenotype remains unknown.MethodsA pooled, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent clinically indicated diagnostic bronchoscopy with gUIP testing at seven academic medical centres across the USA was performed. We assessed the association between gUIP classification and 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. PFS was defined as the time from gUIP testing to death from any cause, lung transplant, ≥10% relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) or censoring at the time of last available FVC measure. Longitudinal change in FVC was then compared between gUIP classification groups using a joint regression model.ResultsOf 238 consecutive patients who underwent gUIP testing, 192 had available follow-up data and were included in the analysis, including 104 with positive gUIP classification and 88 with negative classification. In multivariable analysis, positive gUIP classification was associated with reduced PFS (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.86–2.92; p=0.14), but this did not reach statistical significance. Mean annual change in FVC was −101.8 mL (95% CI −142.7– −60.9 mL; p<0.001) for those with positive gUIP classification and −73.2 mL (95% CI −115.2– −31.1 mL; p<0.001) for those with negative classification (difference 28.7 mL, 95% CI −83.2–25.9 mL; p=0.30).ConclusionsgUIP classification was not associated with differential rates of PFS or longitudinal FVC decline in a multicentre interstitial lung disease cohort undergoing bronchoscopy as part of the diagnostic evaluation.
更多查看译文
关键词
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn