Futile Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

BACKGROUND:It is estimated that >50% of acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) patients with successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment (EVT) have futile recanalization. However, few studies investigated the reasons behind this.OBJECTIVE:To identify the factors associated with futile recanalization in ABAO after successful reperfusion.METHODS:We recruited patients with successful reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2b) after EVT from the Basilar Artery Occlusion Study registry. Patients were divided into meaningful recanalization (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0-3) and futile recanalization (90-day modified Rankin Scale 4-6) groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictors of futile recanalization.RESULTS:A total of 522 patients with successful reperfusion were selected. Of these, 328 patients had futile recanalization and 194 had meaningful recanalization. Multivariable logistic regression shows that higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ( P = .01), higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ( P < .001), longer puncture to recanalization time ( P = .02), lower baseline posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score ( P < .001), lower posterior circulation collateral score ( P = .02), incomplete reperfusion ( P < .001), and diabetes mellitus ( P < .001) were predictors of futile recanalization.CONCLUSION:Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, longer puncture to recanalization time, incomplete reperfusion, stroke severity, lower baseline posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, poor collaterals, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of futile recanalization in patients with ABAO with successful reperfusion after EVT. Moreover, multiple stent retriever passes were associated with a high proportion of futile recanalization in patients with late time windows.