Do Moral Judgment and Reasoning Capability of LLMs Change with Language? A Study Using the Multilingual Defining Issues Test
arXiv (Cornell University)(2024)
摘要
This paper explores the moral judgment and moral reasoning abilitiesexhibited by Large Language Models (LLMs) across languages through the DefiningIssues Test. It is a well known fact that moral judgment depends on thelanguage in which the question is asked. We extend the work of beyond English,to 5 new languages (Chinese, Hindi, Russian, Spanish and Swahili), and probethree LLMs – ChatGPT, GPT-4 and Llama2Chat-70B – that shows substantialmultilingual text processing and generation abilities. Our study shows that themoral reasoning ability for all models, as indicated by the post-conventionalscore, is substantially inferior for Hindi and Swahili, compared to Spanish,Russian, Chinese and English, while there is no clear trend for the performanceof the latter four languages. The moral judgments too vary considerably by thelanguage.
更多查看译文
关键词
Legal Astuteness
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn