AI Can Help Humans Find Common Ground in Democratic Deliberation

Michael Henry Tessler,Michiel A Bakker,Daniel Jarrett,Hannah Sheahan,Martin J Chadwick,Raphael Koster,Georgina Evans, Lucy Campbell-Gillingham, Tantum Collins, David C Parkes,Matthew Botvinick,Christopher Summerfield

Science (New York, NY)(2024)

引用 0|浏览1
摘要
Finding agreement through a free exchange of views is often difficult. Collective deliberation can be slow, difficult to scale, and unequally attentive to different voices. In this study, we trained an artificial intelligence (AI) to mediate human deliberation. Using participants’ personal opinions and critiques, the AI mediator iteratively generates and refines statements that express common ground among the group on social or political issues. Participants ( N = 5734) preferred AI-generated statements to those written by human mediators, rating them as more informative, clear, and unbiased. Discussants often updated their views after the deliberation, converging on a shared perspective. Text embeddings revealed that successful group statements incorporated dissenting voices while respecting the majority position. These findings were replicated in a virtual citizens’ assembly involving a demographically representative sample of the UK population.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
0
您的评分 :

暂无评分

数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn